The Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework is a conceptual toolbox put forward by Elinor Ostrom and colleagues in an effort to identify and delineate the universal common variables that structure the immense variety of human interactions. The framework identifies rules as one of the core concepts to determine the structure of interactions, and acknowledges their potential to steer a community towards more beneficial and socially desirable outcomes. This work presents the first attempt to turn the IAD framework into a computational model to allow communities of agents to formally perform what-if analysis on a given rule configuration. To do so, we define the Action Situation Language -- or ASL -- whose syntax is hgighly tailored to the components of the IAD framework and that we use to write descriptions of social interactions. ASL is complemented by a game engine that generates its semantics as an extensive-form game. These models, then, can be analyzed with the standard tools of game theory to predict which outcomes are being most incentivized, and evaluated according to their socially relevant properties.
翻译:机构分析和发展框架(IAD)是Elinor Ostrom及其同事提出的一个概念工具箱,目的是确定和界定构成人类互动千差万别结构的普遍共同变量。框架将规则确定为确定互动结构的核心概念之一,并承认其有潜力引导社区实现更有益、更可取的社会理想成果。这项工作首次尝试将IAD框架转化为计算模型,使代理群体能够正式进行对特定规则配置的如果分析。为此,我们界定了行动状况语言 -- -- 或ASL -- -- 其语法几乎适合IAD框架的构成部分,并用于描述社会互动。ASL得到一个游戏引擎的补充,该游戏引擎生成其语义作为广泛的游戏。然后,这些模型可以使用标准游戏理论工具进行分析,以预测哪些成果最受激励,并根据其社会相关特性进行评估。