The disruptive offline mobilization of participants in online conspiracy theory (CT) discussions has highlighted the importance of understanding how online users may form radicalized conspiracy beliefs. While prior work researched the factors leading up to joining online CT discussions and provided theories of how conspiracy beliefs form, we have little understanding of how conspiracy radicalization evolves after users join CT discussion communities. In this paper, we provide the empirical modeling of various radicalization phases in online CT discussion participants. To unpack how conspiracy engagement is related to radicalization, we first characterize the users' journey through CT discussions via conspiracy engagement pathways. Specifically, by studying 36K Reddit users through their 169M contributions, we uncover four distinct pathways of conspiracy engagement: steady high, increasing, decreasing, and steady low. We further model three successive stages of radicalization guided by prior theoretical works. Specific sub-populations of users, namely those on steady high and increasing conspiracy engagement pathways, progress successively through various radicalization stages. In contrast, users on the decreasing engagement pathway show distinct behavior: they limit their CT discussions to specialized topics, participate in diverse discussion groups, and show reduced conformity with conspiracy subreddits. By examining users who disengage from online CT discussions, this paper provides promising insights about conspiracy recovery process.
翻译:在网上阴谋理论(CT)讨论中,参与者的破坏性离线动员在网上阴谋理论(CT)讨论中的参与者的破坏性离线动员凸显了理解在线用户如何形成激进密谋信仰的重要性。虽然先前的工作研究了导致加入在线CT讨论的各种因素,并提供了密谋信仰形成如何形成的理论,但我们对用户加入CT讨论社区后密谋激进化如何演变缺乏了解。在本文中,我们提供了在线CT讨论参与者中各种激进化阶段的经验模型。为了解开密阴谋参与与激进化的关系,我们首先通过密谋参与途径来描述用户通过CT讨论的旅程。具体地说,通过对36K Redddit用户的169M贡献,我们发现了四条不同的密谋参与途径:稳定高、增加、减少和稳定地降低。我们进一步以先前的理论著作为指导,对连续三个阶段的激进化阶段进行了模型。具体的用户群体,即稳定高和不断增长的密谋参与途径,在各种激进化阶段不断进步。相反,参与渠道的用户表现出不同的行为:他们将其讨论限制为专门专题,参加多样化的讨论小组,并显示对密谋子重组的遵守程度。我们的用户提供了有希望的见解。