The enormous power consumption of Bitcoin has led to undifferentiated discussions in science and practice about the sustainability of blockchain and distributed ledger technology in general. However, blockchain technology is far from homogeneous - not only with regard to its applications, which now go far beyond cryptocurrencies and have reached businesses and the public sector, but also with regard to its technical characteristics and, in particular, its power consumption. This paper summarizes the status quo of the power consumption of various implementations of blockchain technology, with special emphasis on the recent 'Bitcoin Halving' and so-called 'zk-rollups'. We argue that although Bitcoin and other proof-of-work blockchains do indeed consume a lot of power, alternative blockchain solutions with significantly lower power consumption are already available today, and new promising concepts are being tested that could further reduce in particular the power consumption of large blockchain networks in the near future. From this we conclude that although the criticism of Bitcoin's power consumption is legitimate, it should not be used to derive an energy problem of blockchain technology in general. In many cases in which processes can be digitised or improved with the help of more energy-efficient blockchain variants, one can even expect net energy savings.
翻译:Bitcoin的庞大电力消耗导致在科学和实践上对块链和分布式分类账技术一般的可持续性进行了不加区分的讨论,然而,块链技术远非同质性----不仅其应用方面,它现在远远超出了加密范围,已经触及商业和公共部门,而且其技术特点,特别是其电力消耗;本文总结了各种实施块链技术的电力消耗现状,特别强调了最近的“Bitcoin Halviing”和所谓的“Zk卷轴”。我们认为,虽然Bitcoin和其他工作链确实消耗了大量电力,但今天已经存在电力消耗显著下降的替代块链式解决办法,而且正在测试新的有希望的概念,这些概念可能进一步减少特别是近期大型块链网络的电力消耗。我们从中得出结论,尽管对Bitcoin的电力消耗的批评是合法的,但不应利用它来找出一般的“块链式技术”的能源问题。许多情况下,甚至连锁的能源消费都能够实现更高的数字化或改进。