In this study we analyse the key driving factors of preprints in enhancing scholarly communication. To this end we use four groups of metrics, one referring to scholarly communication and based on bibliometric indicators (Web of Science and Scopus citations), while the others reflect usage (usage counts in Web of Science), capture (Mendeley readers) and social media attention (Tweets). Hereby we measure two effects associated with preprint publishing: publication delay and impact. We define and use several indicators to assess the impact of journal articles with previous preprint versions in arXiv. In particular, the indicators measure several times characterizing the process of arXiv preprints publishing and the reviewing process of the journal versions, and the ageing patterns of citations to preprints. In addition, we compare the observed patterns between preprints and non-OA articles without any previous preprint versions in arXiv. We could observe that the "early-view" and "open-access" effects of preprints contribute to a measurable citation and readership advantage of preprints. Articles with preprint versions are more likely to be mentioned in social media and have shorter Altmetric attention delay. Usage and capture prove to have only moderate but stronger correlation with citations than Tweets. The different slopes of the regression lines between the different indicators reflect different order of magnitude of usage, capture and citation data.
翻译:在这项研究中,我们分析预印在加强学术交流方面的关键驱动因素。为此,我们使用四组衡量标准,其中一组指学术交流,并基于书本指标(科学和史考普斯引用网站),其他则反映使用情况(科学网中的用户数)、捕捉(曼德利读者)和社交媒体关注(Tweets),我们在此衡量预印出版的两种影响:出版延迟和影响。我们界定并使用若干指标评估期刊文章的影响,其前印版在Arxiv的预印版本。特别是,指标衡量印刷预印出版过程和期刊版本审查过程的若干次特征,以及引用预印的老化模式。此外,我们比较预印和非OA文章的预印版和预印版本在Arxiv的预印版本中没有任何预印版本。我们可以观察到预印的“直观”和“可获取性”效应有助于对预印的可测量的引用和读者的优势。预印版前印版本中,印刷前印版本的预印版本比印刷版本的预印的流程和审查过程的流程过程要长得多,但在社会媒体和历史缩缩缩定的顺序中,但仅更可能更能更能更准确地反映不同比例。