Automated recruitment tools are proliferating. While having the promise of improving efficiency, various risks, including bias, challenges the potential of these tools. An in-depth understanding of the perceived risk factors and needs from the perspective of both recruiters and job seekers is needed. We address this through an interview study in the high-tech industry to compare and contrast the concerns of these two roles. We found that the importance of clarifying position requirements and assessing candidates as "whole individuals" are commonly discussed by both recruiters and job seekers. In contrast, while recruiters tended to be more aware of cognitive bias and desired more tool support during interviews, job seekers voiced more desire towards a healthy candidate-company relationship. Additionally, both roles considered the uncertainty of the current technology capability and reduced human contact as concerns for using automated tools. Based on these results, we provided design implications for automated recruitment tools and related decision-support technologies.
翻译:自动化招聘工具正在激增。虽然有提高效率的希望,但各种风险,包括偏见,都对这些工具的潜力提出了挑战。需要从招聘者和求职者的角度深入理解所认识的风险因素和需求。我们需要通过高科技行业的面试研究来解决这一问题,以比较和比较对这两种角色的关切。我们发现,招聘者和求职者通常都讨论澄清职位要求和评估候选人“全员”的重要性。相比之下,虽然招聘者往往更了解认知偏见,希望在面试期间获得更多的工具支持,但求职者表示更希望建立健康的候选公司关系。此外,这两个角色都考虑到当前技术能力的不确定性,减少了人际接触,以此作为使用自动化工具的关切问题。基于这些结果,我们为自动化招聘工具和相关决策支持技术提供了设计影响。