This study contributes to the recent discussions on indicating interdisciplinarity, i.e., going beyond catch-all metrics of interdisciplinarity. We propose a multi-dimensional and contextual framework to improve the granularity and usability of the existing methodology for quantifying the interdisciplinary knowledge flow (IKF) in which scientific disciplines import and export knowledge from/to other disciplines. To characterize the knowledge exchange between disciplines, we recognize three dimensions under this framework, namely, broadness, intensity, and heterogeneity. We show that each dimension covers a different aspect of IKF, especially between disciplines with the largest volume of IKF, and can assist in uncovering different types of interdisciplinarity. We apply this framework in two use cases, one at the level of disciplines and one at the level of journals, to show how it can offer a more holistic and detailed viewpoint on the interdisciplinarity of scientific entities than unidimensional and context-unaware indicators. We further compare our proposed framework, an indicating process, with established indicators and discuss how such information tools on interdisciplinarity can assist science policy practices such as performance-based research funding systems and panel-based peer review processes.
翻译:这项研究有助于最近关于显示不同学科之间差异性的讨论,即超越不同学科之间差异性的全面衡量标准。我们提议了一个多维和背景框架,以改善现有跨学科知识流动量化方法的颗粒性和可用性,科学学科在跨学科知识流中从其他学科/向其他学科输入和输出知识。为说明学科间知识交流的特点,我们认识到这一框架下的三个层面,即广度、强度和异质性。我们进一步比较了我们提议的框架,指明了进程,并讨论了关于不同学科间差异性的信息工具如何有助于不同类别之间的差异性。我们将这一框架应用于两种情况,一种是学科一级,另一种是期刊一级,以表明它如何能够就科学实体之间的差异性提供比单维和不切视背景指标更全面和详细的观点。我们进一步比较了我们提议的框架,指明了进程,并讨论了这些基于不同学科间差异性的信息工具如何协助小组进行同行审查。</s>