Reusing ontologies in practice is still very challenging, especially when multiple ontologies are involved. Moreover, despite recent advances, systematic ontology quality assurance remains a difficult problem. In this work, the quality of thirty biomedical ontologies, and the Computer Science Ontology, are investigated from the perspective of a practical use case. Special scrutiny is given to cross-ontology references, which are vital for combining ontologies. Diverse methods to detect the issues are proposed, including natural language processing and network analysis. Moreover, several suggestions for improving ontologies and their quality assurance processes are presented. It is argued that while the advancing automatic tools for ontology quality assurance are crucial for ontology improvement, they will not solve the problem entirely. It is ontology reuse that is the ultimate method for continuously verifying and improving ontology quality, as well as for guiding its future development. Many issues can be found and fixed only through practical and diverse ontology reuse scenarios.
翻译:在实践中,特别是在涉及多种本源学的情况下,重新使用本源学仍然是非常困难的,此外,尽管最近取得了进步,系统性本源学质量保证仍然是一个困难的问题;在这项工作中,从实际使用个案的角度对30种生物医学本源学和计算机科学本源学的质量进行了调查;对对综合本源学至关重要的跨本源学参考进行了特别审查;提出了发现问题的各种方法,包括自然语言处理和网络分析;此外,提出了改进本源学及其质量保证程序的若干建议;有人认为,虽然推进本源学质量保证的自动工具对于本源学的改进至关重要,但它们不会完全解决问题;本源学再利用是持续核实和改进本源学质量以及指导其未来发展的最终方法;许多问题只能通过实际和多样本源学再利用设想来找到和固定。