Popular music streaming platforms offer users a diverse network of content exploration through a triad of affordances: organic, algorithmic and editorial access modes. Whilst offering great potential for discovery, such platform developments also pose the modern user with daily adoption decisions on two fronts: platform affordance adoption and the adoption of recommendations therein. Following a carefully constrained set of Deezer users over a 2-year observation period, our work explores factors driving user behaviour in the broad sense, by differentiating users on the basis of their temporal daily usage, adoption of the main platform affordances, and the ways in which they react to them, especially in terms of recommendation adoption. Diverging from a perspective common in studies on the effects of recommendation, we assume and confirm that users exhibit very diverse behaviours in using and adopting the platform affordances. The resulting complex and quite heterogeneous picture demonstrates that there is no blanket answer for adoption practices of both recommendation features and recommendations.
翻译:大众音乐流动平台通过三种方式为用户提供了一个内容探索的多样化网络:有机、算法和编辑访问模式。这种平台开发为发现提供了巨大潜力,但这种平台开发也为现代用户带来了日常通过决定的两大方面:平台的采纳和其中的建议的采纳。在经过两年的观察期间,一组“Deezer”用户受到仔细限制,我们的工作探索了广义上驱动用户行为的因素,根据用户的日常时间使用、主要平台的采用以及他们对用户的反应方式,特别是建议采纳的方式,对其进行区分。从关于建议效果的研究的共同观点来看,我们假定并确认用户在使用和采用平台时表现出非常不同的行为。由此产生的复杂和非常多样化的画面表明,对于采用建议特点和建议的做法,没有一刀切的答案。