In this workshop paper, we use an empirical example from our ongoing fieldwork, to showcase the complexity and situatedness of the process of making sense of algorithmic results; i.e. how to evaluate, validate, and contextualize algorithmic outputs. So far, in our research work, we have focused on such sense-making processes in data analytic learning environments such as classrooms and training workshops. Multiple moments in our fieldwork suggest that meaning, in data analytics, is constructed through an iterative and reflexive dialogue between data, code, assumptions, prior knowledge, and algorithmic results. A data analytic result is nothing short of a sociotechnical accomplishment - one in which it is extremely difficult, if not at times impossible, to clearly distinguish between 'human' and 'technical' forms of data analytic work. We conclude this paper with a set of questions that we would like to explore further in this workshop.
翻译:在本讲习班文件中,我们使用了我们正在进行的实地工作的经验实例,以展示使算法结果具有意义的过程的复杂性和位置;即如何评价、验证算法结果,以及将算法结果背景化。迄今为止,在我们的研究工作中,我们在诸如教室和培训讲习班等数据分析学习环境中,注重于这种感知过程。我们实地工作的许多时刻表明,数据分析中的含义是通过数据、代码、假设、先前的知识和算法结果之间反复和反射的对话来构建的。数据分析结果与社会技术成就毫不相干,在社会技术成就中,要明确区分数据分析工作的“人”和“技术”形式是极其困难的,有时甚至不可能的。我们在结束本文时提出了一系列我们希望在本讲习班上进一步探讨的问题。