In today's digital world, interaction with online platforms is ubiquitous, and thus content moderation is important for protecting users from content that do not comply with pre-established community guidelines. Having a robust content moderation system throughout every stage of planning is particularly important. We study the short-term planning problem of allocating human content reviewers to different harmful content categories. We use tools from fair division and study the application of competitive equilibrium and leximin allocation rules. Furthermore, we incorporate, to the traditional Fisher market setup, novel aspects that are of practical importance. The first aspect is the forecasted workload of different content categories. We show how a formulation that is inspired by the celebrated Eisenberg-Gale program allows us to find an allocation that not only satisfies the forecasted workload, but also fairly allocates the remaining reviewing hours among all content categories. The resulting allocation is also robust as the additional allocation provides a guardrail in cases where the actual workload deviates from the predicted workload. The second practical consideration is time dependent allocation that is motivated by the fact that partners need scheduling guidance for the reviewers across days to achieve efficiency. To address the time component, we introduce new extensions of the various fair allocation approaches for the single-time period setting, and we show that many properties extend in essence, albeit with some modifications. Related to the time component, we additionally investigate how to satisfy markets' desire for smooth allocation (e.g., partners for content reviewers prefer an allocation that does not vary much from time to time, to minimize staffing switch). We demonstrate the performance of our proposed approaches through real-world data obtained from Meta.
翻译:在当今的数字世界中,与在线平台的互动无处不在,因此,内容节制对于保护用户不受不符合事先确立的社区准则的内容影响非常重要。在规划的每个阶段都有一个强有力的内容节制系统特别重要。我们研究了将人的内容审评员分配到不同有害内容类别的短期规划问题。我们使用公平分工和研究适用竞争性平衡和地法分配规则的工具。此外,我们将具有实际重要性的新内容纳入传统的渔业市场设置。第一个方面是不同内容类别的工作量预测。我们展示了由庆祝的艾森堡-盖勒方案激励的一种配方如何让我们找到一个不仅满足预测的工作量,而且在所有内容类别中公平地分配剩余审查时间的配方。因此,分配也很强劲,因为在实际工作量与预期工作量不同的情况下,增加分配提供了保障。第二个实际考虑是时间上的分配,因为伙伴需要为审评员安排时间,从不同类别的工作量到实现效率。我们展示了时间组成部分的调整,而不是时间上的调整,我们提出了新的时间,我们从不同的配置到各个内容的配置,我们展示了不同的分配方式,我们为不同的市场规定了新的分配时间,我们从不同的分配,我们从不同的分配,从不同的分配到不同的分配,我们为不同的市场,我们为不同的分配,我们为不同的分配了一定的计算。