Music streaming platforms are currently among the main sources of music consumption, and the embedded recommender systems significantly influence what the users consume. There is an increasing interest to ensure that those platforms and systems are fair. Yet, we first need to understand what fairness means in such a context. Although artists are the main content providers for music platforms, there is a research gap concerning the artists' perspective. To fill this gap, we conducted interviews with music artists to understand how they are affected by current platforms and what improvements they deem necessary. Using a Qualitative Content Analysis, we identify the aspects that the artists consider relevant for fair platforms. In this paper, we discuss the following aspects derived from the interviews: fragmented presentation, reaching an audience, transparency, influencing users' listening behavior, popularity bias, artists' repertoire size, quotas for local music, gender balance, and new music. For some topics, our findings do not indicate a clear direction about the best way how music platforms should act and function; for other topics, though, there is a clear consensus among our interviewees: for these, the artists have a clear idea of the actions that should be taken so that music platforms will be fair also for the artists.
翻译:音乐流流平台目前是音乐消费的主要来源之一,嵌入式建议系统极大地影响着用户消费的内容。 人们越来越有兴趣确保这些平台和系统公平。 然而,我们首先需要了解在这种背景下公平意味着什么。 虽然艺术家是音乐平台的主要内容提供者,但艺术家的观点存在研究空白。为了填补这一空白,我们与音乐艺术家进行了访谈,以了解他们如何受到当前平台的影响以及他们认为必要的改进。我们通过定性内容分析,确定了艺术家认为与公平平台相关的方面。在本文中,我们讨论了来自访谈的以下方面:分散演示、接触观众、透明度、影响用户的听觉行为、受欢迎偏见、艺术家的重编规模、当地音乐配额、性别平衡和新音乐。对于某些专题,我们的调查结果并未明确指明音乐平台应如何运作和运行的最佳方向;对于其他专题,我们受访者之间有明确的共识:艺术家对应当采取的行动有明确的认识,因此,音乐平台对艺术家来说也是公平的。