Accessibility research sits at the junction of several disciplines, drawing influence from HCI, disability studies, psychology, education, and more. To characterize the influences and extensions of accessibility research, we undertake a study of citation trends for accessibility and related HCI communities. We assess the diversity of venues and fields of study represented among the referenced and citing papers of 836 accessibility research papers from ASSETS and CHI, finding that though publications in computer science dominate these citation relationships, the relative proportion of citations from papers on psychology and medicine has grown over time. Though ASSETS is a more niche venue than CHI in terms of citational diversity, both conferences display standard levels of diversity among their incoming and outgoing citations when analyzed in the context of 53K papers from 13 accessibility and HCI conference venues.
翻译：无障碍研究位于多个学科的交汇处,利用HCI、残疾研究、心理学、教育等的影响,我们研究了无障碍研究的影响和扩展。我们研究了无障碍研究的引文趋势和相关HCI社区。我们评估了ASSETS和CHI的836份无障碍研究论文的引用和引用文件所显示的场所和研究领域的多样性。我们发现,虽然计算机科学出版物在这些引用关系中占主导地位,但随着时间的推移,心理学和医学论文引用的相对比例一直在增加。尽管ASSETS在引文多样性方面比CHI更合适,但这两个会议在从13个无障碍和HCI会议场所的53K论文中分析时,其出自和出自引文中都显示了标准的多样性。
相关内容
微信扫码咨询专知VIP会员