We study the performance of the TimeBoost auction, by comparing cumulative fixed time markout of fast lane trades over the TimeBoost interval to bids for the fast lane. Such comparison allows us to assess how well bids predict future extracted value from the time advantage. The correlation between winning bids and markouts is weak across bidders, suggesting that bids are a noisy predictor of extracted value. The correlation slightly improves when comparing paid bids (the second highest bid) instead of winning bids to markouts, which we attribute to the fact that the auction is more of a common value type. In all settings, the relative order of the most frequent bidder performance remains the same, together with their absolute profits. Bids and markouts aggregated over long time intervals exhibit much higher correlation, indicating that bidders detect trends much better than identify when the high arbitrage value is exactly available. One possible explanation for this is the fact that the correlation between previous minute markouts and current minute bids is significant, suggesting that the previous minute markouts is used to predict the next minute value when bidding.
翻译:本研究通过比较TimeBoost拍卖区间内快速通道交易的累计固定时间标记收益与快速通道的竞价,评估TimeBoost拍卖的性能。该比较使我们能够衡量竞价对未来时间优势所提取价值的预测准确性。跨投标人的中标价与标记收益之间的相关性较弱,表明竞价对提取价值的预测存在较大噪声。当使用支付价(次高竞价)而非中标价与标记收益进行比较时,相关性略有提升,我们将其归因于该拍卖更接近共同价值类型。在所有设定中,最频繁投标人的绩效相对排序及其绝对利润保持一致。在长时间区间内聚合的竞价与标记收益表现出更高的相关性,表明投标人更擅长检测趋势而非精确识别高套利价值的具体时机。一种可能的解释是,前一分钟的标记收益与当前分钟的竞价之间存在显著相关性,这暗示投标人在出价时利用前一分钟的标记收益来预测下一分钟的价值。