Governance efforts for artificial intelligence (AI) are taking on increasingly more concrete forms, drawing on a variety of approaches and instruments from hard regulation to standardisation efforts, aimed at mitigating challenges from high-risk AI systems. To implement these and other efforts, new institutions will need to be established on a national and international level. This paper sketches a blueprint of such institutions, and conducts in-depth investigations of three key components of any future AI governance institutions, exploring benefits and associated drawbacks: (1) purpose, relating to the institution's overall goals and scope of work or mandate; (2) geography, relating to questions of participation and the reach of jurisdiction; and (3) capacity, the infrastructural and human make-up of the institution. Subsequently, the paper highlights noteworthy aspects of various institutional roles specifically around questions of institutional purpose, and frames what these could look like in practice, by placing these debates in a European context and proposing different iterations of a European AI Agency. Finally, conclusions and future research directions are proposed.
翻译:人工智能(AI)的治理工作正在采取日益具体的形式,利用从严格监管到标准化努力的各种方法和手段,旨在减轻高风险AI系统的挑战;为了实施这些和其他努力,需要在国家和国际两级建立新的机构;本文件勾画了这类机构的蓝图,深入调查了任何未来的AI治理机构的三个关键组成部分,探索了好处和相关缺陷:(1)宗旨,涉及该机构的总体目标和工作范围或任务范围;(2)地理,涉及参与和管辖权范围问题;(3)能力、机构的基础设施和人员构成;随后,本文件着重介绍了各机构作用的值得注意的方面,具体围绕机构目的问题,并介绍了这些机构在实际中可以看到的情景,将这些辩论置于欧洲背景中并提出欧洲AI机构的不同版本。最后,提出了结论和未来研究方向。