Software effort estimation accuracy is a key factor in effective planning, controlling and to deliver a successful software project within budget and schedule. The overestimation and underestimation both are the key challenges for future software development, henceforth there is a continuous need for accuracy in software effort estimation (SEE). The researchers and practitioners are striving to identify which machine learning estimation technique gives more accurate results based on evaluation measures, datasets and the other relevant attributes. The authors of related research are generally not aware of previously published results of machine learning effort estimation techniques. The main aim of this study is to assist the researchers to know which machine learning technique yields the promising effort estimation accuracy prediction in the software development. In this paper, the performance of the machine learning ensemble technique is investigated with the solo technique based on two most commonly used accuracy evaluation metrics. We used the systematic literature review methodology proposed by Kitchenham and Charters. This includes searching for the most relevant papers, applying quality assessment criteria, extracting data and drawing results. We have evaluated a state-of-the-art accuracy performance of 28 selected studies (14 ensemble, 14 solo) using Mean Magnitude of Relative Error (MMRE) and PRED (25) as a set of reliable accuracy metrics for performance evaluation of accuracy among two techniques to report the research questions stated in this study. We found that machine learning techniques are the most frequently implemented in the construction of ensemble effort estimation (EEE) techniques. The results of this study revealed that the EEE techniques usually yield a promising estimation accuracy than the solo techniques.
翻译:高估和低估是未来软件开发的主要挑战,从此以后,软件工作估算需要不断准确性(SEE) 研究人员和从业人员正在努力确定哪些机读估算技术根据评价措施、数据集和其他相关属性得出更准确的结果。相关研究的作者一般并不了解以前公布的机器学习估算技术的结果。本研究的主要目的是协助研究人员了解哪些机读技术能产生有希望的工作估算准确性预测。在本文件中,机读集合技术的性能以最常用的准确性评价尺度为基础,以单独技术调查机器学习集合技术的性能。我们使用了基钦汉姆和宪章提出的系统文献审查方法。这包括搜索最相关的文件,采用质量评估标准,提取数据和绘图结果。我们评估了28项选定研究(14种文秘,14种索洛)的准确性性业绩评估绩效。我们经常用磁磁精度评估技术的性能评估技术,这是我们所发现的最精确性评估方法。我们所研究的精准性研究的精准性研究(我们所发现的精准性研究的精准性研究的精准性) 。