Podcasts are traditionally shared through RSS feeds. As well as pointing to the audio files, RSS gives a creator a way of providing metadata about the podcast shows and episodes. We investigate how certain metadata fields associated with podcasts are currently being used and comment on their applicability to recommendations. Specifically, we find that many creators are not using the itunes:type field in the expected fashion, and that using this field for recommendations might not lead to an optimal user experience. We perform similar explorations for the season number and the category associated with a podcast, and also find that the fields aren't being used in the expected fashion. Finally, we examine the notion that a single podcast show is the same as a single RSS feed. This also turns out to not be strictly true in all cases. In short, the metadata associated with many podcasts isn't always reflective of the show and should be used with caution.
翻译:播客传统上通过 RSS 接口共享播客。 除了指出音频文件外, RSS 也给创建者提供了提供播客节目和节目的元数据的方法。 我们调查了播客节目中某些元数据字段目前是如何使用的, 并评论了它们是否适用于建议。 具体地说, 我们发现许多创建者没有使用 Iunes: 以预期的方式类型字段, 使用这个字段来提出建议可能不会带来最佳的用户经验 。 我们为播客的季节编号和分类进行类似的探索, 并且发现这些字段没有以预期的方式使用。 最后, 我们审视了单个播客节目与 RSS 种子相同的概念 。 这在所有案例中也不完全属实 。 简言之, 许多播客的元并不总是反映节目, 并且应该谨慎使用 。