Emotion classification in text is typically performed with neural network models which learn to associate linguistic units with emotions. While this often leads to good predictive performance, it does only help to a limited degree to understand how emotions are communicated in various domains. The emotion component process model (CPM) by Scherer (2005) is an interesting approach to explain emotion communication. It states that emotions are a coordinated process of various subcomponents, in reaction to an event, namely the subjective feeling, the cognitive appraisal, the expression, a physiological bodily reaction, and a motivational action tendency. We hypothesize that these components are associated with linguistic realizations: an emotion can be expressed by describing a physiological bodily reaction ("he was trembling"), or the expression ("she smiled"), etc. We annotate existing literature and Twitter emotion corpora with emotion component classes and find that emotions on Twitter are predominantly expressed by event descriptions or subjective reports of the feeling, while in literature, authors prefer to describe what characters do, and leave the interpretation to the reader. We further include the CPM in a multitask learning model and find that this supports the emotion categorization. The annotated corpora are available at https://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/data/emotion.
翻译:文本中的情感分类通常以神经网络模型进行,这些模型可以将语言单位与情感联系起来。虽然这往往导致良好的预测性表现,但了解不同领域的情感传播方式只能有有限程度的帮助。Scherer(2005年)的情感组成部分过程模型(CPM)是解释情感交流的一种有趣的方法。它指出,情感是各种子组成部分的协调过程,是对事件的反应,即主观感觉、认知评估、表达、身体生理反应和动力动作趋势。我们假设这些组成部分与语言认识有关:一种情感可以通过描述生理生理反应(“他发抖”)或表达(“她微笑”)来表达,等等。我们用情感组成部分课来说明现有的文学和推特情感情感体格,发现推特上的情感主要表现为事件描述或对感觉的主观报道,而在文献中,作者更愿意描述人物的行为,并将解释留给读者。我们进一步将CPM纳入多任务学习模型中,并发现这支持情感分类。在 https/wwws/descolimtoras。