Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) promise to revolutionize how content creators (e.g., artists) price and sell their work. One core feature of NFTs is the option to embed creator royalties which earmark a percentage of future sale proceeds to creators, each time their NFTs change hands. As popular as this feature is in practice, its utility is often questioned because buyers, the argument goes, simply ``price it in at the time of purchase''. As intuitive as this argument sounds, it is incomplete. We find royalties can add value to creators in at least three distinct ways. (i) Risk sharing: when creators and buyers are risk sensitive, royalties can improve trade by splitting the risks associated with future price volatility; (ii) Dynamic pricing: in the presence of information asymmetry, royalties can extract more revenues from better-informed speculators over time, mimicking the benefits of ``dynamic pricing''; (iii) Price discrimination: when creators sell multi-unit NFT collections, royalties can better capture value from heterogeneous buyers. Our results suggest creator royalties play an important and sometimes overlooked role in the economics of NFTs.
翻译:内容创作者(如艺术家)的定价和销售其作品的方式是革命性的。NFT的一个核心特征是将创作者使用费嵌入其中,每次其未来销售收益的一定比例指定给创作者,每次其NFTs换手。由于这个特点在实际中很受欢迎,其效用经常受到质疑,因为购买者,这种论点说,只是在购买时“在购买时”“定价”而已。这种论点是不完整的。我们至少以三种不同的方式发现版权可以给创作者增加价值。 (一) 风险分担:当创作者和购买者对风险敏感时,使用费可以通过分散与未来价格波动有关的风险来改善贸易;(二) 动态定价:在信息不对称的情况下,使用费可以从知情的投机者那里获取更多收入,在时间上模拟“动力定价”的好处;(三) 价格歧视:当创作者出售多单位NFT收藏时,使用费可以更好地从不同购买者那里获取价值。我们的研究结果表明,创作者使用费在经济中扮演了重要、有时被忽视的角色。