The computing research community needs to work much harder to address the downsides of our innovations. Between the erosion of privacy, threats to democracy, and automation's effect on employment (among many other issues), we can no longer simply assume that our research will have a net positive impact on the world. While bending the arc of computing innovation towards societal benefit may at first seem intractable, we believe we can achieve substantial progress with a straightforward step: making a small change to the peer review process. As we explain below, we hypothesize that our recommended change will force computing researchers to more deeply consider the negative impacts of their work. We also expect that this change will incentivize research and policy that alleviates computing's negative impacts.
翻译:计算机研究界需要更加努力地解决我们创新的不利因素。 在隐私被侵蚀、民主受到威胁和自动化对就业的影响(除其他问题外)之间,我们再也不能仅仅假设我们的研究会对世界产生净的积极影响。 在将计算创新转向社会效益的圈子弯曲时,我们起初看似难以解决,但我们认为我们可以通过一个直接的步骤取得实质性进展:对同行审议进程做一个小的改变。 正如下文所解释的那样,我们假设我们建议的改变会迫使计算机研究人员更深入地考虑其工作的负面影响。 我们还期望这一改变将激励减轻计算负面影响的研究和政策。