The development of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has far exceeded the investigation of their relationship with society. Sociotechnical inquiry is needed to mitigate the harms of new technologies whose potential impacts remain poorly understood. To date, subfields of AI research develop primarily individual views on their relationship with sociotechnics, while tools for external investigation, comparison, and cross-pollination are lacking. In this paper, we propose four directions for inquiry into new and evolving areas of technological development: value--what progress and direction does a field promote, optimization--how the defined system within a problem formulation relates to broader dynamics, consensus--how agreement is achieved and who is included in building it, and failure--what methods are pursued when the problem specification is found wanting. The paper provides a lexicon for sociotechnical inquiry and illustrates it through the example of consumer drone technology.
翻译:人工智能(AI)技术的发展远远超过了对其与社会关系的调查,需要社会技术调查来减轻新技术的危害,这些新技术的潜在影响仍然不为人知,迄今为止,AI研究的次领域主要就它们与社会技术的关系形成个人的看法,而外部调查、比较和交叉污染的工具却缺乏。我们在本文件中提出了调查技术发展新领域和不断演变的领域的四个方向:在问题提法中,什么是进步和方向能促进的领域,什么是进步和方向,什么是进步和方向能优化在问题提法中界定的系统与更广泛的动态、达成共识-方法协定的达成和谁参与其建立有关,在发现问题规格不足时,什么是失败的方法。本文提供了社会技术调查的词汇,并以消费者无人驾驶技术为例加以说明。