Instead of proofs or logical evaluations, compliance assessment could be done by benchmarking. Benchmarks, in their nature, are applied. So a set of benchmarks could shape an applied solution for compliance assessment. In this paper, we introduce the KARB solution: Keeping away compliance Anomalies by Rule-based Benchmarking. By rule-based benchmarking, we mean evaluation of under-compliance-system by its symbolic specification and by using a set of symbolic rules (on behalf of semantic logic of evaluation). In order to demonstrate and investigate the manner of KARB solution, we conducted a case study. The IR-QUMA study (Iranian Survey on Quality in Messenger Apps) is defined to evaluate the quality of some messenger apps. the results of evaluations suggest that the Hybrid Method of DD-KARB (with combination of semantics-awareness and data-drivenness) is more effective than solo-methods and could compute a somehow good estimation for messenger-apps user quality scores. So DD-KARB could be considered as a method for quality benchmarking in this technical context.
翻译:采用基准,这样一套基准就可以形成一个应用的遵约评估解决方案。在本文中,我们引入了KARB解决方案:通过基于规则的基准来避免不遵约现象。根据基于规则的基准,我们指通过象征性的规格和使用一套象征性规则(代表评价的语义逻辑)来评估不遵守制度。为了展示和调查KARB解决方案的方式,我们进行了一项案例研究。IR-QUMA研究(伊朗关于信使应用程序质量的调查)被确定为评估某些信使应用程序的质量。评价结果表明,DD-KARB混合方法(结合语义意识和数据驱动)比索洛方法更为有效,可以对信使应用用户质量评分进行某种良好的估计。因此,DD-KARB可以被视为在这一技术背景下评估质量基准的一种方法。