In this paper, we examine the effect of various contracts between a socially concerned airport and an environmentally conscious airline regarding their profitability and channel coordination under two distinct settings. First, we consider no government interventions, while in the second, we explore government-imposed taxations to curb emissions. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of passenger greening sensitivity, greening cost, and consumer surplus coefficient on conveyance fees, ticket fare, greening level and the channel welfare. Our analysis shows that the revenue sharing and linear two part tariff contracts coordinate the decentralised airport-airline channel. Our findings also reveal that players greening and social efforts can improve both the welfare and efficiency of the channel simultaneously. Importantly, under government interventions, taxation does help improve the greening level of the channel in both coordinating and non coordinating contracts. However, the greening level in the non-coordinating contracts with taxation is still less than the coordinating contracts even without tax. Finally, we also extended the model to include a duopoly airline market with pricing and greening competition. We analyze the effect of competetiton between airlines on airport utility, airline profit, ticket fare and greening level.
翻译:在本文中,我们研究了社会相关机场和有环境意识的航空公司之间各种合同对其在两种不同环境下的盈利和频道协调的影响。第一,我们考虑政府不采取任何干预措施,而第二,我们探索政府施加的税收以遏制排放。此外,我们调查旅客绿化敏感性、绿化成本和消费者剩余系数对运输费、机票票价、绿化水平和频道福利的影响。我们的分析表明,收入分享和线性两个部分的关税合同协调分散的机场-航空通道。我们的调查结果还显示,绿化和社会努力既可以同时改善频道的福利和效率。重要的是,在政府干预下,税收确实有助于提高协调和非协调合同渠道的绿化水平。然而,不协调税务合同中的绿化水平仍然低于协调合同,即使没有税收。最后,我们还扩展了模式,将具有定价和绿化竞争的双曲线航空市场包括在内。我们分析了航空公司在机场公用事业、航空利润、票价和绿化水平上竞争的影响。