Gender differences in research productivity are well documented, and have been mostly explained by access parental leave and child-related responsibilities. Those explanations are based on the assumption that women take on the majority of childcare responsibilities, and take the same level of leave at the birth of a child. Changing social dynamics around parenting has seen fathers increasingly take an active role in parenting. This demands a more nuanced approach to understanding how parenting affects both men and women. Using a global survey of 11,226 academic parents, this study investigates the effect of parental engagement (Lead, Dual (shared), and Satellite parenting), and partner type, on measures of research productivity and impact for men and for women. It also analyzes the effect of different levels of parental leave on academic productivity. Results show that the parenting penalty for men and women is a function of the level of engagement in parenting activities. Men who serve in lead roles suffer similar penalties, but women are more likely to serve in lead parenting roles and to be more engaged across time and tasks. Taking a period of parental leave is associated with higher levels of productivity, however the productivity advantage is lost for the US-sample at 6 months, and at 12-months for the non-US sample. These results suggest that parental engagement is a more powerful variable to explain gender differences in academic productivity than the mere existence of children, and that policies should that factor into account.
翻译:研究生产率方面的性别差异有详细的记载,而且大部分的解释是获得育儿假和与子女有关的责任。这些解释所依据的假设是,妇女承担了大部分育儿责任,在孩子出生时休同样的假期。育儿方面的社会动态变化使父亲越来越多地在养育子女方面发挥积极作用。这要求采取更加细致的方法来了解养育子女对男子和妇女的影响。利用对11 226个学术家长的全球调查,这项研究调查了父母参与(Lead、Dual(共享)和卫星养育)和伙伴类型对研究生产力和对男子和妇女影响的措施的影响。这些解释还分析了不同程度的育儿假对学术生产力的影响。结果显示,对男子和妇女的育儿处罚是从事育儿活动程度的一种功能。担任领导角色的男子受到类似的惩罚,但妇女更有可能担任养育子女的领导角色,并且更经常地和多地参与。育儿假的时间和任务与更高的生产力水平有关,但是对美国研究人员的生产力优势却在6个月里丧失。对于养育子女的参与程度的影响,在12个月里,从性别比例上看,从一个比较明显的样本中可以解释为什么儿童在12个月里的存在。