Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are often used in the automotive industry to highlight innovative improvements in vehicle safety. However, today it is unclear whether certain automation (e.g., adaptive cruise control, lane keeping, parking assist) increases safety of our roads. In this paper, we investigate driver awareness, use, perceived safety, knowledge, training, and attitudes toward ADAS with different automation systems/features. Results of our online survey (n=1018) reveal that there is a significant difference in frequency of use and perceived safety for different ADAS features. Furthermore, we find that at least 70% of drivers activate an ADAS feature "most or all of the time" when driving, yet we find that at least 40% of drivers report feeling that ADAS often compromises their safety when activated. We also find that most respondents learn how to use ADAS in their vehicles by trying it out on the road by themselves, rather than through any formal driver education and training. These results may mirror how certain ADAS features are often activated by default resulting in high usage rates. These results also suggest a lack of driver training and education for safely interacting with, and operating, ADAS, such as turning off systems/features. These findings contribute to a critical discussion about the overall safety implications of current ADAS, especially as they enable higher-level automation features to creep into personal vehicles without a lockstep response in training, regulation, and policy.
翻译:汽车业经常使用高级驾驶协助系统(ADAS)来突出车辆安全的创新改进,然而,目前尚不清楚某些自动化(例如适应性游轮控制、车道维修、停车协助)是否会加强我们的道路安全。在本文件中,我们用不同的自动化系统/功能调查驾驶员的认识、使用、安全感知、知识、培训和对ADAS的态度。我们的在线调查(n=1018)结果显示,不同ADAS特性的使用频率和安全感知差异很大。此外,我们发现至少有70%的驾驶员在驾驶时“最多或全部时间”启动ADAS特性,但我们发现至少有40%的驾驶员报告说,ADAS在启动时往往会损害他们的安全。我们还发现,大多数受访者通过自己在路上尝试ADAS,而不是通过任何正式的驾驶员教育和培训来学习如何在汽车上使用ADAS。这些结果可能反映出,由于违约导致高使用率,ADAS特性往往会引发某些ADAS特性。这些结果还表明,缺乏对驾驶员进行安全性互动的培训和教育,并且操作ADAS在不具有关键性地影响,从而使个人安全性地进入了自动化。这些系统,使ADAS能够使安全性分析。