We present a comparative study of classical numerical solvers, such as Petviashvili's method or finite difference with Newton iterations, and neural network-based methods for computing ground states or profiles of solitary-wave solutions to the one-dimensional dispersive PDEs that include the nonlinear Schrödinger, the nonlinear Klein-Gordon and the generalized KdV equations. We confirm that classical approaches retain high-order accuracy and strong computational efficiency for single-instance problems in the one-dimensional setting. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are also able to reproduce qualitative solutions but are generally less accurate and less efficient in low dimensions than classical solvers due to expensive training and slow convergence. We also investigate the operator-learning methods, which, although computationally intensive during training, can be reused across many parameter instances, providing rapid inference after pretraining, making them attractive for applications involving repeated simulations or real-time predictions. For single-instance computations, however, the accuracy of operator-learning methods remains lower than that of classical methods or PINNs, in general.
翻译:本文对经典数值求解器(如Petviashvili方法或结合牛顿迭代的有限差分法)与基于神经网络的方法进行了比较研究,这些方法用于计算一维色散偏微分方程(包括非线性薛定谔方程、非线性克莱因-戈登方程和广义KdV方程)的基态或孤立波解的剖面。我们证实,在一维单实例问题中,经典方法保持了高阶精度和强大的计算效率。物理信息神经网络(PINNs)也能够复现定性解,但由于训练成本高和收敛速度慢,在低维情况下通常比经典求解器的精度和效率更低。我们还研究了算子学习方法,这些方法虽然在训练阶段计算量大,但可以在多个参数实例中重复使用,在预训练后提供快速推断,使其在涉及重复模拟或实时预测的应用中具有吸引力。然而,对于单实例计算,算子学习方法的精度通常仍低于经典方法或PINNs。