Purpose: This paper explores the influencing factors of Twitter mentions of scientific papers. The results can help to understand the relationships between various altmetrics. Design/methodology/approach: Data on research mentions in Altmetric.com and a multiple linear regression analysis are used. Findings: The number of mainstream news is the factor that most influences the number of mentions on Twitter, followed by its influence on public policies through references in reports. The influence is weaker in the case of mentions on Wikipedia and the fact of dealing with a highly topical issue such as COVID-19. The recommendation of experts and mentions in patent applications have a negative influence, while the consolidation of knowledge in the form of a review does not have a significant influence. Research limitations: A specific field was studied in a specific time period. Studying other fields and/or different time periods might result in different findings. Practical implications: Governments increasingly push researchers toward activities with societal impact and this study can help understand how different factors affect social media attention. Originality/value: Understanding social media attention of research is essential when implementing societal impact indicators.
翻译:研究结果:主流新闻的数量是影响Twitter上提及次数的最主要因素,其次是其通过报告引用对公共政策的影响。在提及维基百科和处理诸如COVID-19等高度热门议题时,影响较弱。专家的建议和专利申请中提及的情况具有消极的影响,而以审查形式合并知识则没有显著的影响。研究局限:在特定时期内对一个特定领域进行了研究。研究其他领域和/或不同的时段可能导致不同的结果。实际影响:各国政府越来越多地将研究人员推向具有社会影响的活动,这项研究有助于了解不同因素如何影响社会媒体的关注。真知灼见/价值:在执行社会影响指标时,了解社会媒体对研究的关注至关重要。