Interdisciplinary research increasingly fuels innovation, and is considered to be a key to tomorrow breakthrough. Yet little is known about whether interdisciplinary research manifests delayed impact. Here, we use the time to reach the citation peak to quantify the highest impact time and citation dynamics, and examine its relationship with interdisciplinarity. Using large scale publication datasets, our results suggest that interdisciplinary papers show significant delayed impact both microscopically per paper and macroscopically collectively, as it takes longer time for interdisciplinary papers to reach their citation peak. Furthermore, we study the underlying forces of such delayed impact, finding that the effect goes beyond the Matthew effect (i.e., the rich-get-richer effect). Finally, we find that team size and content conventionality only partly account for this effect. Overall, our results suggest that governments, research administrators, funding agencies should be aware of this general feature of interdisciplinary science, which may have broad policy implications.
翻译:跨学科研究日益刺激创新,并被认为是未来突破的关键。然而,对于跨学科研究是否显示出延迟影响知之甚少。 在这里,我们利用时间达到引用高峰以量化影响时间和引用动态最高,并研究其与不同性之间的关系。 我们的研究结果表明,跨学科文件显示出了微缩的延迟影响,包括纸面和宏观综合影响,因为跨学科文件需要较长的时间才能达到其引用高峰。 此外,我们研究了这种延迟影响的潜在力量,发现其影响超出了马修效应(即富饶效应 ) 。 最后,我们发现团队规模和内容传统性只是这一效应的部分原因。 总之,我们的结果表明,各国政府、研究行政人员、供资机构应该意识到跨学科科学的这一普遍特征,这可能具有广泛的政策影响。