Using observed language to understand interpersonal interactions is important in high-stakes decision making. We propose a causal research design for observational (non-experimental) data to estimate the natural direct and indirect effects of social group signals (e.g. race or gender) on speakers' responses with separate aspects of language as causal mediators. We illustrate the promises and challenges of this framework via a theoretical case study of the effect of an advocate's gender on interruptions from justices during U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments. We also discuss challenges conceptualizing and operationalizing causal variables such as gender and language that comprise of many components, and we articulate technical open challenges such as temporal dependence between language mediators in conversational settings.
翻译:我们提议对观测(非实验性)数据进行因果研究设计,以估计社会群体信号(例如种族或性别)对发言者反应的自然直接和间接影响,并以不同语言作为因果调解者。我们通过对一名律师的性别对美国最高法院口头辩论期间司法中断的影响进行理论案例研究,来说明这一框架的许诺和挑战。我们还讨论构思和实施由许多组成部分组成的性别和语言等因果变数的挑战。我们阐述了技术公开挑战,如语言调解员在谈话环境中的暂时依赖性。