Proximal causal inference was recently proposed as a framework to identify causal effects from observational data in the presence of hidden confounders for which proxies are available. In this paper, we extend the proximal causal approach to settings where identification of causal effects hinges upon a set of mediators which unfortunately are not directly observed, however proxies of the hidden mediators are measured. Specifically, we establish (i) a new hidden front-door criterion which extends the classical front-door result to allow for hidden mediators for which proxies are available; (ii) We extend causal mediation analysis to identify direct and indirect causal effects under unconfoundedness conditions in a setting where the mediator in view is hidden, but error prone proxies of the latter are available. We view (i) and (ii) as important steps towards the practical application of front-door criteria and mediation analysis as mediators are almost always error prone and thus, the most one can hope for in practice is that our measurements are at best proxies of mediating mechanisms. Finally, we show that identification of certain causal effects remains possible even in settings where challenges in (i) and (ii) might co-exist.
翻译:最近有人提议,作为确定观察数据的因果关系的框架,在有代理人的隐蔽混淆者在场的情况下,作为查明观察数据的因果关系的框架,我们提出近似因果推断;在本文件中,我们将最接近因果因果分析方法推广到以下环境,即确定因果影响取决于一组调解人,但不幸的是,这些调解人没有直接观察,而隐藏调解人的代理人则加以衡量。具体地说,我们制定了(一) 一个新的隐蔽门前标准,扩大传统的门前结果,允许有代理人的隐蔽调解人;(二) 我们扩大因果调解分析,以确定在调解人所见的隐蔽但容易出错的环境下的直接和间接因果影响。我们认为(一) 和(二) 是实际应用前门标准和调解分析的重要步骤,因为调解人几乎总是容易出错,因此在实践中最希望的是,我们的计量是最佳的调解机制的代理人。最后,我们表明,即使在存在挑战(一)和(二)可能存在共同共存的环境下,某些因果影响仍然是可能的。