Assessing the impact of scholarly books is a difficult research evaluation problem. Library Catalog Analysis facilitates the quantitative study, at different levels, of the impact and diffusion of academic books based on data about their availability in libraries. The WorldCat global catalog collates data on library holdings, offering a range of tools including the novel WorldCat Identities. This is based on author profiles and provides indicators relating to the availability of their books in library catalogs. Here, we investigate this new tool to identify its strengths and weaknesses based on a sample of Bibliometrics and Scientometrics authors. We review the problems that this entails and compare Library Catalog Analysis indicators with Google Scholar and Web of Science citations. The results show that WorldCat Identities can be a useful tool for book impact assessment but the value of its data is undermined by the provision of massive collections of ebooks to academic libraries.
翻译:评估学术书籍的影响是一个困难的研究评估问题。图书馆目录分析促进各级根据图书馆可用数据对学术书籍的影响及其传播进行定量研究。世界目录全球目录收集图书馆藏书数据,提供各种工具,包括新颖的世界目录特征,以作者简介为基础,提供图书馆目录中图书可用性的指标。我们在这里调查这一新工具,根据文献计量和科学计量作者样本,查明其优缺点。我们审查由此引起的问题,并将图书馆目录分析指标与谷歌学者和科学网引文进行比较。结果显示,世界目录特征可以成为评估图书影响的有用工具,但由于向学术图书馆大量收藏图书,其数据的价值受到损害。