This study is a survey of digital library initiatives in India collecting secondary information from about fifty digital libraries from their respective websites. The findings show that in most cases the actual conception of the digital library is still in a nascent stage. Online subscriptions and links to third-party websites are also considered digital libraries. However, many digital libraries do have not any proper search interface on their respective website due to improper arrangement of metadata. In some cases, they do not have their own digitized collection and provided other collections or referred to their users to some third-party website. Moreover, there are many digital libraries that cannot be accessed outside (remote access) of the organization. Hence, regular website maintenance, remote access facility, and proper training of information professionals are required. Moreover, the so-called digital libraries in India have not developed their own standards or are not following any global standards. However, the usage statistics for government digital libraries are far better than the usage statistics of academic or public libraries. Users are perhaps more interested in government rules, laws, orders, etc. That is perhaps a positive sign of digital governance and reaching the public. There are several important observations and policy suggestions that may be helpful for students, scholars, library professionals, and the decision-makers in the government.
翻译:该研究以印度大约50个数字图书馆的网站为信息来源,对数字图书馆的发展进行了调查。调查发现,大多数数字图书馆的构想仍处于起步阶段。许多数字图书馆认为在线订阅和第三方网站链接也属于数字图书馆。但由于元数据的不当安排,在许多情况下,它们没有适当的搜索界面。在某些情况下,它们没有自己的数字化藏品,提供其他藏品或将用户转至第三方网站。此外,有许多数字图书馆仅能在组织内部进行访问(即无法进行远程访问)。因此,需要进行定期网站维护,提供远程访问功能,以及为信息专业人员提供适当的培训。此外,所谓的数字图书馆在印度没有发展出自己的标准,也没有遵循任何全球标准。然而,政府数字图书馆的使用统计要比学术或公共图书馆的使用统计要好得多。用户可能更感兴趣的是政府法规、法律、命令等内容。这或许是数字治理和覆盖公众的一个积极信号。本文为学生、学者、图书馆专业人员以及政策制定者提供了许多重要的观察和建议。