Collective decision-making is vital for recent information and communications technologies. In our previous research, we mathematically derived conflict-free joint decision-making that optimally satisfies players' probabilistic preference profiles. However, two problems exist regarding the optimal joint decision-making method. First, as the number of choices increases, the computational cost of calculating the optimal joint selection probability matrix explodes. Second, to derive the optimal joint selection probability matrix, all players must disclose their probabilistic preferences. Now, it is noteworthy that explicit calculation of the joint probability distribution is not necessarily needed; what is necessary for collective decisions is sampling. This study examines several sampling methods that converge to heuristic joint selection probability matrices that satisfy players' preferences. We show that they can significantly reduce the above problems of computational cost and confidentiality. We analyze the probability distribution each of the sampling methods converges to, as well as the computational cost required and the confidentiality secured. In particular, we introduce two conflict-free joint sampling methods through quantum interference of photons. The first system allows the players to hide their choices while satisfying the players' preferences almost perfectly when they have the same preferences. The second system, where the physical nature of light replaces the expensive computational cost, also conceals their choices under the assumption that they have a trusted third party. This paper has been published in Phys. Rev. Applied 18, 064018 (2022) (DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.18.064018).
翻译:集体决策对最近的信息和通信技术至关重要。 在先前的研究中,我们从数学上得出无冲突联合决策,以最佳的方式满足参与者的概率偏好。然而,在最佳联合决策方法方面存在着两个问题。首先,随着选择数量的增加,计算最佳联合选择概率矩阵的计算成本会爆炸。第二,为了得出最佳的联合选择概率矩阵,所有参与者都必须披露其概率偏好。现在,值得注意的是,明确计算联合概率分布不一定必要;集体决定所需要的是抽样。本研究考察了几种抽样方法,这些方法与满足参与者偏好的超常联合选择概率矩阵汇合在一起。我们表明,它们可以大大减少以上计算成本和保密问题。我们分析了每个抽样方法的概率分布,以及所需的计算成本和保密性。特别是,我们通过光量干扰引入两种无冲突联合抽样方法。第一个系统允许参与者在满足参与者的第三个偏好时隐藏其选择,同时满足了他们几乎完全的偏好。第二个系统在18:103/06-18页的物理光度假设中隐藏了成本。