Context: Prior research has established that a small proportion of individuals dominate team communication during global software development. It is not known, however, how these members' contributions affect their teams' knowledge diffusion process, or whether their personality profiles are responsible for their dominant presence. Objective: We set out to address this gap through the study of repository artifacts. Method: Artifacts from ten teams were mined from the IBM Rational Jazz repository. We employed social network analysis (SNA) to group practitioners into two clusters, Top Members and Others, based on the numbers of messages they communicated and their engagement in task changes. SNA metrics (density, in-degree and closeness) were then used to study practitioners' importance in knowledge diffusion. Thereafter, we performed psycholinguistic analysis on practitioners' messages using linguistic dimensions that had been previously correlated with the Big Five personality profiles. Results: For our sample of 146 practitioners we found that Top Members occupied critical roles in knowledge diffusion, and demonstrated more openness to experience than the Others. Additionally, all personality profiles were represented during teamwork, although openness to experience, agreeableness and extroversion were particularly evident. However, no specific personality predicted members' involvement in knowledge diffusion. Conclusion: Task assignment that promotes highly connected team communication networks may mitigate tacit knowledge loss in global software teams. Additionally, while members expressing openness to experience are likely to be particularly driven to perform, this is not entirely responsible for a global team's success.
翻译:先前的研究证实,在全球软件开发过程中,一小部分个人主宰了团队通信,但尚不清楚这些成员的贡献如何影响团队的知识传播进程,或他们的个性特征是否对其存在负有主要责任。 目标:我们准备通过研究存放物文物来弥补这一差距。 方法:10个团队的人工制品是从IBM iralal Jazz储存库中提取的。 我们利用社会网络分析(SNA)将从业者分为两类:顶级成员和他人,根据他们传达的信息数量和参与任务变化的情况。 国民账户体系的衡量标准(密度、程度和距离)随后被用来研究从业人员在知识传播方面的重要性。 之后,我们利用以前与五大个人格特征特征特征相关的语言层面,对从业人员的信息进行了心理语言分析。 研究结果:我们发现146名顶级成员在知识传播方面扮演着关键角色,对经验的开放程度比其他人要高。 此外,所有个性特征概况在团队工作期间都有代表,尽管对经验、可接受性与特异性进行了开放,但后来用于研究实践者在知识传播方面的重要性。然而,没有任何具体的人格驱动者预测说,全球知识传播团队可能具有高度透明度。