In a crowdsourcing contest, a requester holding a task posts it to a crowd. People in the crowd then compete with each other to win the rewards. Although in real life, a crowd is usually networked and people influence each other via social ties, existing crowdsourcing contest theories do not aim to answer how interpersonal relationships influence peoples' incentives and behaviors, and thereby affect the crowdsourcing performance. In this work, we novelly take peoples' social ties as a key factor in the modeling and designing of agents' incentives for crowdsourcing contests. We then establish a new contest mechanism by which the requester can impel agents to invite their neighbours to contribute to the task. The mechanism has a simple rule and is very easy for agents to play. According to our equilibrium analysis, in the Bayesian Nash equilibrium agents' behaviors show a vast diversity, capturing that besides the intrinsic ability, the social ties among agents also play a central role for decision-making. After that, we design an effective algorithm to automatically compute the Bayesian Nash equilibrium of the invitation crowdsourcing contest and further adapt it to large graphs. Both theoretical and empirical results show that, the invitation crowdsourcing contest can substantially enlarge the number of contributors, whereby the requester can obtain significantly better solutions without a large advertisement expenditure.
翻译:在众包竞赛中,一个要求者将任务张贴到人群中。人群中的人然后相互竞争以赢得奖赏。虽然在现实生活中,人群通常是网络化的,人们通常通过社会联系相互影响,但现有的众包竞争理论并不旨在回答人际关系如何影响人们的激励和行为,从而影响众包业绩。在这项工作中,我们新颖地将人民的社会联系作为制作和设计多方包办比赛代理商激励因素的一个关键因素。然后,我们建立了一个新的竞争机制,让请求者能够通过该机制催化代理商邀请邻居为任务作出贡献。这个机制有一个简单的规则,而且对于代理商来说非常容易发挥作用。根据我们的平衡分析,在巴伊西亚纳什均衡代理商的行为表现出了巨大的多样性,除了内在能力之外,他们之间的社会联系也为决策工作发挥了核心作用。 之后,我们设计了一种有效的算法,可以自动理解邀请多方包竞争的巴伊西亚纳什平衡,并进一步将其调整为大图表。 无论是理论还是实证性结果都表明,邀请的多方包商可以大大扩大费用,从而大大扩大费用要求。