Clarification is increasingly becoming a vital factor in various topics of information retrieval, such as conversational search and modern Web search engines. Prompting the user for clarification in a search session can be very beneficial to the system as the user's explicit feedback helps the system improve retrieval massively. However, it comes with a very high risk of frustrating the user in case the system fails in asking decent clarifying questions. Therefore, it is of great importance to determine when and how to ask for clarification. To this aim, in this work, we model search clarification prediction as user engagement problem. We assume that the better a clarification is, the higher user engagement with it would be. We propose a Transformer-based model to tackle the task. The comparison with competitive baselines on large-scale real-life clarification engagement data proves the effectiveness of our model. Also, we analyse the effect of all result page elements on the performance and find that, among others, the ranked list of the search engine leads to considerable improvements. Our extensive analysis of task-specific features guides future research.
翻译:要求用户在搜索会话中作出澄清,对系统非常有益,因为用户的明确反馈有助于系统大规模改进检索工作。然而,如果系统无法提出体面的澄清问题,则极有可能使用户感到沮丧。因此,确定何时和如何要求澄清非常重要。为此,我们在这项工作中将搜索澄清预测作为用户参与问题进行模拟。我们假定,越是澄清,用户参与程度越高。我们建议采用一个基于变换器的模式来处理这项任务。将大规模实际生活澄清参与数据的竞争性基线进行比较,证明我们模式的有效性。此外,我们分析所有结果页面要素对业绩的影响,发现搜索引擎排名清单除其他外导致显著改进。我们广泛分析具体任务特点,指导未来研究。