The increasing progress in artificial intelligence and respective machine learning technology has fostered the proliferation of chatbots to the point where today they are being embedded into various human-technology interaction tasks. In enterprise contexts, the use of chatbots seeks to reduce labor costs and consequently increase productivity. For simple, repetitive customer service tasks such already proves beneficial, yet more complex collaborative knowledge work seems to require a better understanding of how the technology may best be integrated. Particularly, the additional mental burden which accompanies the use of these natural language based artificial assistants, often remains overlooked. To this end, cognitive load theory implies that unnecessary use of technology can induce additional extrinsic load and thus may have a contrary effect on users' productivity. The research presented in this paper thus reports on a study assessing cognitive load and productivity implications of human chatbot interaction in a realistic enterprise setting. A/B testing software-only vs. software + chatbot interaction, and the NASA TLX were used to evaluate and compare the cognitive load of two user groups. Results show that chatbot users experienced less cognitive load and were more productive than software-only users. Furthermore, they show lower frustration levels and better overall performance (i.e, task quality) despite their slightly longer average task completion time.
翻译:人工智能和相应机器学习技术的日益进步促使闲聊机器人的扩散,以致于闲聊机器人今天被植入各种人类技术互动任务之中。在企业背景下,闲聊机器人的使用旨在降低劳动力成本,从而提高生产力。对于简单、重复的客户服务任务,这些已经证明是有益的,然而,更为复杂的协作知识工作似乎要求更好地了解如何最好地整合这些技术。特别是,使用这些自然语言的人工助理人员所带来的额外的心理负担,往往仍然被忽视。为此,认知负荷理论意味着,不必要地使用技术可以带来额外的外部负荷,从而可能对用户的生产率产生相反的影响。本文中的研究因此报告了在现实的企业环境中评估人类闲聊机器人互动的认知负荷和生产力影响的研究报告。A/B测试软件与软件+聊天博特互动,美国航天局的TLX用于评价和比较两个用户群体的认知负荷。结果显示,闲聊用户的认知负荷较少,而且比软件用户的用户更有成效。此外,他们表现出低的沮丧程度和更高的总体业绩,尽管他们的工作完成得稍慢。