Recently artificial neural networks (ANNs) have seen success in volatility prediction, but the literature is divided on where an ANN should be used rather than the common GARCH model. The purpose of this study is to compare the volatility prediction performance of ANN and GARCH models when applied to stocks with low, medium, and high volatility profiles. This approach intends to identify which model should be used for each case. The volatility profiles comprise of five sectors that cover all stocks in the U.S stock market from 2005 to 2020. Three GARCH specifications and three ANN architectures are examined for each sector, where the most adequate model is chosen to move on to forecasting. The results indicate that the ANN model should be used for predicting volatility of assets with low volatility profiles, and GARCH models should be used when predicting volatility of medium and high volatility assets.
翻译:最近人工神经网络(ANNs)在波动性预测方面取得了成功,但文献对应在何处使用ANN的文献有分歧,而不是GRCH通用模型,本研究的目的是比较ANN和GARCH模型在适用于低、中、高波动性能的种群时的波动性预测性能;这种方法旨在确定每个案例应使用哪种模型;波动性能剖面由五个部门组成,涵盖2005年至2020年美国股票市场的所有库存;审查了GARCH的三个规格和三个ANN结构,每个部门都选择了最适当的模型进行预测;结果显示,应当使用ANN模型来预测波动性低的资产的波动性;在预测中、高波动性能资产时,应当使用GARCH模型。