Newspaper reports provide a rich source of information on the unfolding of public debate on specific policy fields that can serve as basis for inquiry in political science. Such debates are often triggered by critical events, which attract public attention and incite the reactions of political actors: crisis sparks the debate. However, due to the challenges of reliable annotation and modeling, few large-scale datasets with high-quality annotation are available. This paper introduces DebateNet2.0, which traces the political discourse on the European refugee crisis in the German quality newspaper taz during the year 2015. The core units of our annotation are political claims (requests for specific actions to be taken within the policy field) and the actors who make them (politicians, parties, etc.). The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we document and release DebateNet2.0 along with its companion R package, mardyR, guiding the reader through the practical and conceptual issues related to the annotation of policy debates in newspapers. Second, we outline and apply a Discourse Network Analysis (DNA) to DebateNet2.0, comparing two crucial moments of the policy debate on the 'refugee crisis': the migration flux through the Mediterranean in April/May and the one along the Balkan route in September/October. Besides the released resources and the case-study, our contribution is also methodological: we talk the reader through the steps from a newspaper article to a discourse network, demonstrating that there is not just one discourse network for the German migration debate, but multiple ones, depending on the topic of interest (political actors, policy fields, time spans).
翻译:报纸报告提供了大量关于具体政策领域的公共辩论展开情况的信息来源,这些辩论可以作为政治科学调查的基础,这些辩论往往是由重大事件引发的,这些事件引起公众的注意并引起政治行为者的反应:危机引发了辩论,然而,由于可靠的注解和建模的挑战,几乎没有大量具有高质量注解的大型数据集。本文介绍了DiudNet2.0, 记录了2015年期间德国优质报纸塔兹关于欧洲难民危机的政治讨论。 我们的注解的核心单位是政治主张(要求在政策领域采取具体行动)和作出这些声明的行为者(政治人物、政党等)。 本文的贡献是双重的。 首先,我们记录和发布DiuddalNet2.0及其配套的R包, MardyR, 指导读者了解与报纸政策辩论相关的实际和概念问题。 其次,我们概述并应用Discount网络分析(DNA)用于辩论2.0, 比较政治辩论的两个关键时刻,而不是在政策辩论领域展开的争论,而不是在9月的一个时间段上,“brical-rical inter comm rual rude” ex ex:除了我们所谈到的移徙/s the salbal learbilding the real real real report the ex the ex the lax the ex the slemlemlemal leglemal