In the YS. and M. and S. judgment, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled on three procedures in which Dutch judges asked for clarification on the right of asylum seekers to have access to the documents regarding the decision on asylum applications. The judgment is relevant for interpreting the concept of personal data and the scope of the right of access under the Data Protection Directive, and the right to good administration in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. At first glance, the judgment seems disappointing from the viewpoint of individual rights. Nevertheless, in our view the judgment provides sufficient grounds for effective access rights to the minutes in future asylum cases.
翻译:在YS.、M.与S.案判决中,欧盟法院就荷兰法官提出的三个程序作出裁决,这些程序涉及寻求庇护者获取庇护申请决定相关文件的权利。该判决对解释《数据保护指令》中个人数据的概念与访问权范围,以及《欧盟基本权利宪章》中的良好行政权具有重要影响。初看之下,该判决从个人权利视角似乎令人失望。然而,我们认为该判决为未来庇护案件中有效获取会议记录的权利提供了充分依据。