The use of digital resources has been increasing in every instance of todays society, being it in business or even ludic purposes. Despite such ever increasing use of technologies as interfaces, in all fields, it seems that it lacks the importance of users perception in this context. This work aims to present a case study about the evaluation of ECAs. We propose a Long-Term Interaction (LTI) to evaluate our conversational agent effectiveness through the user perception and compare it with Short-Term Interactions (STIs), performed by three users. Results show that many different aspects of users perception about the chosen ECA (i.e. Arthur) could be evaluated in our case study, in particular that LTI and STI are both important in order to have a better understanding of ECA impact in UX.
翻译:数字资源的使用在当今社会的每一个例子中都一直在增加,无论是在商业领域,甚至是出于偶然目的。尽管在所有领域越来越多地使用技术作为接口,但似乎缺乏用户在这方面的看法的重要性。这项工作旨在提出对评价ECA的案例研究。我们建议通过用户的看法来评价我们的谈话代理的有效性,并与三个用户进行的短期互动进行比较。结果显示,用户对所选ECA(即Arthur)的看法的许多不同方面可以在我们的案例研究中加以评价,特别是为了更好地了解非洲经委会在UX的影响,LTI和STI都很重要。