Accessibility research has grown substantially in the past few decades, yet there has been no literature review of the field. To understand current and historical trends, we created and analyzed a dataset of accessibility papers appearing at CHI and ASSETS since ASSETS' founding in 1994. We qualitatively coded areas of focus and methodological decisions for the past 10 years (2010-2019, N=506 papers), and analyzed paper counts and keywords over the full 26 years (N=836 papers). Our findings highlight areas that have received disproportionate attention and those that are underserved--for example, over 43% of papers in the past 10 years are on accessibility for blind and low vision people. We also capture common study characteristics, such as the roles of disabled and nondisabled participants as well as sample sizes (e.g., a median of 13 for participant groups with disabilities and older adults). We close by critically reflecting on gaps in the literature and offering guidance for future work in the field.
翻译：在过去几十年中,无障碍研究大幅增加,然而,没有开展这方面的文献审查。为了了解当前和历史趋势,我们创建并分析了自1994年ASSETS成立以来在CHI和ASSETS上出现的无障碍文件数据集。我们从质量上规范了过去十年(2010-2019年,N=506文件)的重点领域和方法决定,分析了整个26年的纸张计数和关键词(N=836文件)。我们的调查结果突出显示了受到过度关注的领域和得不到充分服务的领域,例如,过去十年中超过43%的论文涉及盲人和低视力者的无障碍问题。我们还捕捉了共同的研究特点,如残疾和非残疾参与者的作用以及抽样大小(例如残疾和老年人参与群体13中位)。我们最后认真思考了文献方面的差距,并为今后实地工作提供了指导。
相关内容
微信扫码咨询专知VIP会员