We consider a two-stage electricity market comprising a forward and a real-time settlement. The former pre-dispatches the power system following a least-cost merit order and facing an uncertain net demand, while the latter copes with the plausible deviations with respect to the forward schedule by making use of power regulation during the actual operation of the system. Standard industry practice deals with the uncertain net demand in the forward stage by replacing it with a good estimate of its conditional expectation (usually referred to as a point forecast), so as to minimize the need for power regulation in real time. However, it is well known that the cost structure of a power system is highly asymmetric and dependent on its operating point, with the result that minimizing the amount of power imbalances is not necessarily aligned with minimizing operating costs. In this paper, we propose a mixed-integer program to construct, from the available historical data, an alternative estimate of the net demand that accounts for the power system's cost asymmetry. Furthermore, to accommodate the strong dependence of this cost on the power system's operating point, we use clustering to tailor the proposed estimate to the foreseen net-demand regime. By way of an illustrative example and a more realistic case study based on the European power system, we show that our approach leads to substantial cost savings compared to the customary way of doing.
翻译:我们考虑的是由先期和实时解决组成的两阶段电力市场。前一阶段在成本最低的功绩顺序下,在面临不确定的净需求的情况下,先先发发制电力系统,而后者则通过在电力系统实际运行期间使用电力管制条例,应付在远期时间表上可能存在的偏离;标准行业做法处理的是前期不确定的净需求,办法是用对其有条件期望的准确估计(通常称为点预测)来取代前期的净需求,以便尽可能减少实时电力管制的需要。然而,众所周知,电力系统的成本结构高度不对称,取决于其运行点,其结果是,将电力不平衡程度降到最低并不一定与最大限度地降低运营成本相一致。在本文件中,我们提出了一个混合整数方案,以现有历史数据为基础,对电力系统的成本不对称性预期的净需求进行替代性估计。此外,为了适应这一费用对电力系统运行点的高度依赖,我们利用集群将拟议的估计数与预期的净需求制度相匹配。通过一种说明性的方法,通过一种说明性的方法,将欧洲的储蓄率进行比较,我们用一个更现实的案例研究,我们用一个比较了一种实际的办法来证明成本的方法,以证明我们的系统。