In this chapter, we review the class of causal effects based on incremental propensity scores interventions proposed by Kennedy [2019]. The aim of incremental propensity score interventions is to estimate the effect of increasing or decreasing subjects' odds of receiving treatment; this differs from the average treatment effect, where the aim is to estimate the effect of everyone deterministically receiving versus not receiving treatment. We first present incremental causal effects for the case when there is a single binary treatment, such that it can be compared to average treatment effects and thus shed light on key concepts. In particular, a benefit of incremental effects is that positivity - a common assumption in causal inference - is not needed to identify causal effects. Then we discuss the more general case where treatment is measured at multiple time points, where positivity is more likely to be violated and thus incremental effects can be especially useful. Throughout, we motivate incremental effects with real-world applications, present nonparametric estimators for these effects, and discuss their efficiency properties, while also briefly reviewing the role of influence functions in functional estimation. Finally, we show how to interpret and analyze results using these estimators in practice, and discuss extensions and future directions.
翻译:在本章中,我们根据肯尼迪[2019]提出的递增偏好分分数干预措施,审查因果影响类别。递增偏好分数干预措施的目的是估计增加或减少受治疗对象接受治疗的可能性的影响;这与平均治疗效果不同,因为平均治疗效果的目的是估算所有确定接受治疗者相对于不接受治疗者的影响。我们首先对单一二进制治疗的情况提出递增因果影响,这样就可以与平均治疗效果进行比较,从而阐明关键概念。特别是,递增效果的好处是,对准性(即因果推断中常见的假设)并不需要用来确定因果关系效果。然后,我们讨论在多个时间点衡量治疗效果的更一般案例,即假定性更有可能被违反,因而增量效果特别有用。我们从总体上鼓励对现实应用的递增效应,提出这些效果的非参数性估量,并讨论其效率特性,同时简要回顾影响功能估计的作用。最后,我们展示如何在实践中使用这些估量因素来解释和分析结果,并讨论延期和今后的方向。