We propose three novel consistent specification tests for quantile regression models which generalize former tests in three ways. First, we allow the covariate effects to be quantile-dependent and nonlinear. Second, we allow parameterizing the conditional quantile functions by appropriate basis functions, rather than parametrically. We are hence able to test for functional forms beyond linearity, while retaining the linear effects as special cases. In both cases, the induced class of conditional distribution functions is tested with a Cram\'{e}r-von Mises type test statistic for which we derive the theoretical limit distribution and propose a bootstrap method. Third, to increase the power of the tests, we further suggest a modified test statistic. We highlight the merits of our tests in a detailed MC study and two real data examples. Our first application to conditional income distributions in Germany indicates that there are not only still significant differences between East and West but also across the quantiles of the conditional income distributions, when conditioning on age and year. The second application to data from the Australian national electricity market reveals the importance of using interaction effects for modelling the highly skewed and heavy-tailed distributions of energy prices conditional on day, time of day and demand.
翻译:我们建议对四分位回归模型进行三种新的一致规格测试,这些测试以三种方式将以前的测试进行概括化。 首先,我们允许共变效应以四分位独立和非线性方式进行。 其次,我们允许通过适当的基础功能而不是参数性参数来参数化有条件的四分位函数。 因此,我们能够测试超越线性功能的功能形式,同时保留线性效应作为特殊情况。 在这两种情况下,有条件分配功能的诱导类别都用Cram\{{e}r-von Mises 类型测试统计数据进行测试,我们据此得出理论限制分布,并提出一种靴子捕方法。 第三,为了提高测试的功率,我们进一步建议修改测试统计。我们在详细的MC研究和两个真实数据实例中强调了我们测试的优点。我们在德国对有条件收入分配的首次应用表明,不仅东部和西部之间,而且在有条件收入分配的四分点之间,在时间和年份的调节时,不仅存在重大差异。 澳大利亚国家电力市场的第二个数据应用显示,使用交互效应来模拟高度扭曲和密集的能源需求日的固定能源价格分配。