In the classical Bonus-Malus System (BMS) in automobile insurance, the premium for the next year is adjusted according to the policyholder's claim history (particularly frequency) in the previous year. Some variations of the classical BMS have been considered by taking more of driver's claim experience into account to better assess individual's risk. Nevertheless, we note that in practice it is common for a BMS to adopt transition rules according to the claim history for the past multiple years in countries such as Belgium, Italy, Korea, and Singapore. In this paper, we revisit a modified BMS which was briefly introduced in \citet{L1995} and \citet{PDW03}. Specifically, such a BMS extends the number of Bonus-Malus (BM) levels due to an additional component in the transition rules representing the number of consecutive claim-free years. With the extended BM levels granting more reasonable bonus to careful drivers, this paper investigates the transition rules in a more rigorous manner, and provides the optimal BM relativities under various statistical model assumptions including the frequency random effect model and the dependent collective risk model. Also, numerical analysis of a real data set is provided to compare the classical BMS and our proposed BMS.
翻译:在汽车保险的典型Bonus-Malus系统(BMS)中,下一年的保险费根据投保人上一年的索赔历史(特别是频率)调整,对传统的BMS的某些变化进行了考虑,将更多的驾驶员索赔经验考虑在内,以便更好地评估个人的风险。然而,我们注意到,在实践中,在比利时、意大利、韩国和新加坡等国,BMS通常会根据过去几年的索赔历史采用过渡规则。在比利时、意大利、韩国和新加坡等国,本文将重新审视修改的BMS, 并在\citet{L1995}和\citet{PDW03}中简要介绍。具体地说,这种BMS扩大了Bonus-Malus(BM)的水平,因为过渡规则中增加了一个组成部分,代表连续无索偿年的数目。由于延长的BMS等级,给谨慎的驾驶员以更合理的奖金,本文以更严格的方式调查过渡规则,并在各种统计模型假设下提供最佳的BMS相对关系,包括频率随机效应模型和依赖性集体风险模型。此外,BMS扩大了我们提议的BMS和BMS的真正数据分析。