Intuitively there is a drastic distinction between the pure decentralized block-chain systems like Defis and those that only utilize block-chain as an enhancing technology but remain centralized with real-world business model and conventional technologies like database, application server, etc. Our study explores extensively this distinction from a methodological point of view, classifies them into blockchain-complete and blockchain-partial, analyzes key features of the two types, and reveals the root cause of this distinction. We analyze the function or, in more strong words, the "ultimate purpose" of blockchain in the blockchain-partial systems, and present a conceptual model we named proof-chain that quite satisfactorily represented the general paradigm of blockchain in blockchain-partial systems. A universal tension between strength of proof-chain and privacy is then revealed and the zero-knowledge based proof-chain takes shape. Several case studies demonstrate the explaining power of our proof-chain methodology. We then apply proof-chain methodology to the analysis of the ecosystem of a collaborating group of blockchain-partial systems, representing the paradigm of public and private data domain whose border the proof-chain crosses. Finally, some derived guidelines from this methodology speak usefulness of our methodology.
翻译:我们的研究从方法角度广泛探讨这种区别,将两者分为封闭式链条和封闭式链条等,分析这两种类型的关键特征,并揭示这种区别的根源。我们分析构件链条系统的功能,或用更强烈的措辞分析构件链条的“最终目的 ”, 并提出一个概念模型,我们点名的验证链非常令人满意地代表了封闭式链条系统块链条的一般范式。随后暴露出验证链和隐私的力量与零知识制成的验证链之间的普遍紧张关系。一些案例研究展示了我们验证式链方法的解释力。然后,我们用验证式链方法分析一个串件系统协作组的生态系统,代表着公、私数据领域的范例,其边界是临界链条。最后,从这一方法中衍生出的一些指导方针说明了我们方法的有用性。