In psychiatric diagnosis, a contemporary data-driven, manual-based method for mental disorders classification is the most popular technique; however, it has several inevitable flaws. Using the three-way decision as a framework, we propose a unified model that stands for clinicians' subjective approach (CSA) analysis consisting of three parts: quantitative analysis, quantitative analysis, and evaluation-based analysis. A ranking list and a set of numerical weights based on illness magnitude levels according to the clinician's greatest degree of assumptions are the findings of the qualitative and quantitative investigation. We further create a comparative classification of illnesses into three groups with varying important levels; a three-way evaluation-based model is utilized in this study for the aim of understanding and portraying these results in a more clear way. This proposed method might be integrated with the manual-based process as a complementary tool to improve precision while diagnosing mental disorders
翻译:在精神诊断中,数据驱动的手工分类是最流行的技术,但它也有一些不可避免的缺点。本研究提出了一个基于三元决策框架的统一模型,用于分析临床医生的主观方法(CSA),包括定量分析、质量分析和基于评估的分析三个部分。定性和定量研究的结果是一份排名列表和一组基于疾病严重程度级别的数字权重,这些权重是根据临床医生最大程度的假设而指定的。我们进一步将疾病进行比较,分成三个具有不同重要水平的组; 本研究采用了三元评估模型,旨在更清晰地理解和描绘这些结果。这种提出的方法可以作为补充工具与手工分类过程相结合,从而提高诊断精度。