Online political advertising has grown significantly over the last few years. To monitor online sponsored political discourse, companies such as Facebook, Google, and Twitter have created public Ad Libraries collecting the political ads that run on their platforms. Currently, both policymakers and platforms are debating further restrictions on political advertising to deter misuses. This paper investigates whether we can reliably distinguish political ads from non-political ads. We take an empirical approach to analyze what kind of ads are deemed political by ordinary people and what kind of ads lead to disagreement. Our results show a significant disagreement between what ad platforms, ordinary people, and advertisers consider political and suggest that this disagreement mainly comes from diverging opinions on which ads address social issues. Overall our results imply that it is important to consider social issue ads as political, but they also complicate political advertising regulations.
翻译:过去几年来,在线政治广告大幅增长。 为了监测在线赞助的政治话语,Facebook、Google和Twitter等公司创建了公共Ad图书馆,收集其平台上的政治广告。 目前,决策者和平台都在辩论进一步限制政治广告以阻止滥用。 本文调查了我们是否能够可靠地区分政治广告和非政治广告。 我们用经验分析普通人认为何种广告是政治广告,何种广告导致分歧。 我们的结果显示,广告、普通民众和广告商认为什么是政治广告存在重大分歧,并表明这种分歧主要来自不同观点,而广告是针对社会问题的。 总体而言,我们的结果意味着必须将社会问题广告视为政治广告,但它们也使政治广告条例复杂化。