PhD students report a higher prevalence of mental illness symptoms than highly educated individuals in the general population. This situation presents a serious problem for universities. Thus, the knowledge about this phenomenon is of great importance in decision-making. In this paper we use the Nature PhD survey 2019 and estimate several binomial logistic regression models to analyze the risk of interrupting doctoral studies. This risk is measured through the desire of change in either the supervisor or the area of expertise, or the wish of not pursue a PhD. Among the explanatory factors, we focus on the influence of anxiety/depression, discrimination, and bullying. As control variables we use demographic characteristics and others related with the doctoral program. Insufficient contact time with supervisors, and exceeding time spent studying -crossing the 50-h week barrier-, are risk factors of PhD studies interruption, but the most decisive risk factor is poor mental health. Universities should therefore foster an environment of well-being, which allows the development of autonomy and resilience of their PhD students or, when necessary, which fosters the development of conflict resolution skills.
翻译:博士生认为,精神病症状的发病率高于一般人口中受过高等教育的人。这种情况对大学来说是一个严重的问题。因此,关于这一现象的知识在决策中非常重要。我们在本文件中使用自然博士调查2019,估计了几个二元后勤回归模型来分析中断博士研究的风险。这种风险是通过主管或专业领域或不攻读博士的愿望变化来衡量的。在解释因素中,我们侧重于焦虑/抑郁、歧视和欺凌的影响。作为控制变量,我们使用人口特征以及与博士方案有关的其他因素。与主管的接触时间不足和超时学习――跨过50周屏障――是博士研究中断的危险因素,但最决定性的危险因素是心理健康状况不佳。因此,大学应当营造一种幸福的环境,从而能够发展博士生的自主权和复原力,或者在必要时,促进冲突解决技能的发展。