This contribution summarizes the participation of the UNIMIB team to the TREC 2021 Clinical Trials Track. We have investigated the effect of different query representations combined with several retrieval models on the retrieval performance. First, we have implemented a neural re-ranking approach to study the effectiveness of dense text representations. Additionally, we have investigated the effectiveness of a novel decision-theoretic model for relevance estimation. Finally, both of the above relevance models have been compared with standard retrieval approaches. In particular, we combined a keyword extraction method with a standard retrieval process based on the BM25 model and a decision-theoretic relevance model that exploits the characteristics of this particular search task. The obtained results show that the proposed keyword extraction method improves 84% of the queries over the TREC's median NDCG@10 measure when combined with either traditional or decision-theoretic relevance models. Moreover, regarding RPEC@10, the employed decision-theoretic model improves 85% of the queries over the reported TREC's median value.
翻译:本文总结了UNIMIB小组参与TREC 2021临床试验轨迹的情况。我们调查了不同查询说明和若干检索功能检索模型的影响。首先,我们采用了神经重新排序方法研究密集文本显示的有效性。此外,我们调查了一个新的决策理论模型的有效性,以进行相关性估计。最后,上述两个相关模型都与标准检索方法进行了比较。特别是,我们将关键词提取方法与基于BM25模型的标准检索程序以及利用这一特定搜索任务特点的决策理论相关性模型结合起来。获得的结果显示,拟议的关键词提取方法改进了TREC中位NDCG@10测量方法的84%的查询,同时结合了传统或决定理论相关性模型。此外,关于RPEC@10, 所使用的决定理论模型改善了所报告的TREC中位值的85%查询。